Enterprise Service Cloud in China

I am in China this week, meeting with customers and partners, and presenting on “Next Generation SOA”. Although China embraced the original wave of SOA, companies here are very quickly extending SOA into new areas. For example, the concept of Internet of Things is extremely advanced here, with most manufacturers instrumenting their equipment to enable better, more proactive response to maintenance issues. SOA is the underlying fabric of this.

While in Shanghai, I had the opportunity to meet with one of our China SI partners, Cap Gemini. They have coined the concept of an “Enterprise Cloud Bus,” which is a layer outside your ESB that exposes services and apps to the outside world. I like this thought, though I think “Enterprise Service Cloud” may be a better name. The idea is that there are sets of services and APIs that organizations want to expose internally and externally. These services may be traditional XML/SOAP services, or they may be JSON/REST services. They may interface to a combination of internal and external applications (cloud and on-premise). These same services can be used across multiple channels: internal applications, Web, partner applications, mobile, open APIs, even devices. Hence, the same service may have multiple interfaces and policies, and may even be presented as an open API rather than a traditional service.

We implement this pattern all the time, though often this layer is not called out separately from the ESB. However, the security and policy management requirements it raises, along with the need to support unpredictable load spikes due to the various ways the services can be accessed, make it prudent to look at this as a separate layer, even though technically many of these capabilities can be handled directly in the ESB. In fact, this concept originated with ESBs, which largely started out implementing service facade patterns on top of proprietary applications. The primary difference (and why many ESBs fail to enable this properly) is that the consumption model has become much more complex while the protocol has become markedly more open. As service/API consumers become more varied and plentiful, and more unknowns creep in around things like who will access, how, and from where, planning for this layer becomes imperative, and simply assuming your ESB provider can do it well is not a safe bet (even if they say they can).


Tagged , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: